Beto O'Rourke Claims if You Don't Give Up Your AR-15 Then He Will Take Them

Beto O'Rourke Claims if You Don't Give Up Your AR-15 Then He Will Take Them

Molon labe...

America's Keepers

We are YOUR patriotic watch dog... Standing behind America since 1776.

We have heard him say it before, so it really comes as no surprise that he would say it again in the train wreck of a debate that happened last night, October 15, 2019. Beto O'Rourke once again claims that he is coming for your guns and you better give them to him. Well, in the words of the famous Spartan King, "Come and get them..."

O’Rourke reiterated his plan to use a government-mandated buyback to confiscate privately-owned AR-15s and AK-47s. In so doing, he claimed that each AR-15 and AK-47 in private hands is a “potential instrument of terror.”

Instrument of terror? The only terror coming our way is this blatant violation of the constitution and manipulation of the written law. The terror, is YOU Beto. The only reason you would even contemplate something so stupid is because you have little understanding of the tyranny you represent. Or perhaps you do understand it - and that in and of itself is a whole new level and brand of terror that our country does not need.

CNN’s Anderson Cooper then asked O’Rourke how he plans to get people to hand over their rifles.

O’Rourke responded by explaining that he expects complains with the mandatory buybacks. He said, “I expect my fellow Americans to follow the law. The same way we enforce any provision, any law that we have right now, we don’t go door to door to do anything to enforce the law. I expect Republicans, Democrats, gun owners, non-gun owners alike, to follow the law.”

Hey Beto, you big dummy, we ARE following the law. It is you who is trying to manipulate what is already written. So, Cooper asked what we are all wondering, and that is what he plans on doing if Americans decide not to comply with this abuse of lawful interpretation.

O’Rourke said, “If someone does not turn an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war, or brings it out in public and brandishes it, in an attempt to intimidate…then that weapon will be taken from them. If they persist, there will be other consequences from law enforcement.” 

Another consequence? It's clear to me that you have not thought all the way through this scenario, sir.

You made it clear in the last debate that the government would no go door to door to confiscate weapons, yet you act as if you will if we don't come to you. Law abiding citizens are not going to come to you to surrender their weapons. They just aren't... And if you are doing this to ensure the safety of America and it's citizens, that means you believe that We, The People, are in fact dangerous.

One last thing, last night, you said that the AR-15 was designed to kill people on the battle field. You say it is a weapon of war. A weapon of war has to be developed solely for the military. These weapons are designed, manufactured and distributed under a military weapons contract. The AR-15 was not under any military contracts according to recent research and documentation. HOWEVER, the M-16 WAS. That does not mean the AR-15 and M-16 are the same. They are not. The AR-15 is not a weapon of war designed to kill people.

We are america's keepers

We are here to determine the truth from fiction. To keep you in the know with the information others may be afraid to confront. To support our Military, First Responders, and every Patriot from coast to coast. Be sure to visit our store to help us stay here.


1 comment

  • Bruce Sawyer

    i stand with you!

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published